And lastly the duty of Santa Cruz titled blocked highway linking Santa Cruz Cochabamba. As you can see the headlines of these printed media of the country reflect a common denominator that the country lives again a climate of tension and anxiety as a result of the Gasolinazo regarding the gasolinazo, yesterday, December 29 newspapers in Bolivia, on their front pages, they said the following: La Razon, foods rise and are scarce; drivers insist with cigarettes; The journal, Gasolinazo causes inflationary spiral; The press growing discontent and drivers ignore the Government rates; Times, ATT approves 30% increase to passages; South Government mail fixed new tariffs and transport does not accept them; The star of the East, sectors are articulated against the gasolinazo. And lastly the duty of Santa Cruz titled blocked highway linking Santa Cruz Cochabamba. As you can see the headlines of these printed media of the country reflect a common denominator that the country lives again a climate of tension and anxiety as a result of the Gasolinazo. Is paradoxical for the actions of the Government, when he supported the law against racism and all forms of discrimination at any cost, and now only favours four sectors with 20 per cent would perhaps this isn’t social and economic inequality? Not is it discrimination? What about other impoverished sectors of the country? How will those survive indigent and unemployed of the country? How much improved the country’s economy for? the poorest? Why many people still being vacated since it joined the more power? Where is the agenda of October? Suma qamana or living as provided for in the political Constitution of the State, only seems exist in the imagination of some men. What happens at the current juncture, is the Government divided and calmed the needs of some sectors with bonds, which will not reach impose the totally.
In the name of the famous process of change, the more it seems to expand in the State power by believing and dreaming that change will gradually when many poor people live and lived a miserable childhood. Before the gasolinazo, why the Government did not create more sources of employment for everyone and increased wages for workers. Why the Government so the pretext of preventing smuggling, not controlled by the armed forces, customs, police and other entities. Of not abrogate totally 748?, is imminent in the country, that the gap between rich and poor are expanded and family disintegration, crime, child exploitation and other injustices will intensify. When it the country will really change? Will it be when the indigenous majority in government power? Original author and source of the article.