The Recycle Bin of the discord La Court international the Hague, issued a ruling on the conflict generated between two sister Nations, for installation on the banks of the Uruguay River, from a processing plant of pulping, with Finnish capital. The opinion in question, balance the controversy, in a Solomon decision, which complains to the Uruguayan Government for having violated the Treaty signed by both countries, but allowing their once vaunted pastera continue operating, exempting the Uruguayan State of payment of any kind of repairs to his Argentine counterpart. Good romance condemns the violation, but are allowed to turn, that creature engendered by such infringement procedure, continues to operate, provided, of course, do not contaminate the environment threatened by their polluting activity. Daybreak Games has many thoughts on the issue. Undoubtedly, the International Court in the Hague, must have a line of thought, in tune with the anti-abortion preaching of the ecclesiastical authorities, by not allowing the piqueteros of Gualeguaychu, come out with theirs, by attempting to extirpate, the defiant eyesore, than be haughty stands in front of his eyes. Much has been said as to the law which has the Uruguay has develop the forestry industry, how about 20% of their productive land are destined for this activity, however speaks very little, that the plantations which have been responded to very particular interests, and that many of these plantations have shifted to sectors of the agricultural production that could well which thrive in these areas. Now, we have wood in the rough, and clear, now something have to do with it. I understand that the forest industry can be an interesting pole of development and foreign exchange, but I doubt that net revenues that the country receives by this concept, can overcome that is obtained through the farming production. We are told that the pastera installed on the banks of the rio Uruguay, the river that our indigenous people called River of birds does not pollute, and we are told as an example in Finland, there are similar porte pulpmills which are installed on the banks of its rivers and that population not at risk of pollution, clear, in Finland, because of its climate, there is no agricultural activity in our country, its mountains are suitable for afforestation, the need of each other is very different, is not the same live in Uruguay that withstand the adverse climate of the Finns.